
The Verse That Sparks the Debate
In Matthew 23:8–10, Jesus says:
“But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.” (Matthew 23:8–10)
At first glance, this sounds absolute.
If taken literally:
- You cannot call your biological dad “father.”
- You cannot call Abraham “father.”
- You cannot call any spiritual leader “father.”
- You cannot call anyone “teacher.”
But if that is what Jesus meant, then we immediately have a problem.
Because the rest of the New Testament does exactly that.
So what is going on?
If Taken Literally, Scripture Would Contradict Itself
Let’s look at how the apostles used the word “father” and “teacher.”
1. Stephen Calls Religious Leaders “Fathers”
“Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken…” (Acts 7:2)
Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 7:55), addresses Jewish leaders as “fathers.”
If Jesus meant the phrase literally, Stephen would be disobeying Christ.
2. Abraham Is Called “Father”
Paul writes:
“Abraham, who is the father of us all.” (Romans 4:16)
In John 8:39, the Jews say:
“Abraham is our father.”
Jesus does not deny Abraham being called father. Instead, He says:
“If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.” (John 8:39)
He corrects their behavior — not the title.
3. Paul Calls Himself a Spiritual Father
Paul says to the Corinthians:
“For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.” (1 Corinthians 4:15)
He even calls Timothy:
“My beloved and faithful son in the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 4:17)
In 2 Corinthians 11:2, Paul compares himself to a father giving his virgin daughter in marriage to Christ.
Was Paul violating Jesus’ command?
Of course not.
4. Paul Calls Himself a Teacher (Didaskalos)
Jesus said:
“One is your teacher (didaskalos), the Christ.” (Matthew 23:8)
But Paul writes:
“A teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.” (1 Timothy 2:7)
The Greek word used?
Didaskalos — the exact same word.
So is Paul contradicting Jesus?
No.
Because Jesus was not forbidding titles.
He was correcting something deeper.
The Context Is Everything
Matthew 23 begins with Jesus rebuking the Pharisees:
“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.” (Matthew 23:2)
He warns the people:
- They love titles.
- They love honor.
- They love public recognition.
- They bind heavy burdens.
- They demand unquestioning loyalty.
The issue was not vocabulary.
The issue was authority and allegiance.
What Jesus Was Really Saying
When Jesus said:
“Call no man your father…”
He was addressing spiritual absolutism.
He was saying:
Do not treat any human authority as infallible.
Do not give any human being the kind of unquestioning allegiance that belongs to God alone.
Only:
- The Father in heaven is infallible.
- The Son is perfect and sinless.
- The Spirit never misleads.
No earthly religious leader can claim that.
That is the point.
This Is Proven by the Parallel Statement
Jesus also said:
“Be not ye called Rabbi… for one is your Master, even Christ.” (Matthew 23:8)
Yet Ephesians 4:11 says:
“He gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers.”
The church clearly has teachers.
So what is forbidden?
Not the role.
Not the title.
But the attitude of blind submission.
The Real Issue: Infallibility
Jesus is warning against:
- Elevating religious leaders as untouchable.
- Treating them as flawless.
- Giving them divine-level authority.
Only God deserves:
- Absolute trust.
- Unquestioned allegiance.
- Perfect confidence.
No priest.
No pastor.
No pope.
No rabbi.
No apostle.
Only God.
This Is Why Scripture Commands Testing Leaders
Even Paul says:
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
The Bereans were praised because:
“They searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)
They even tested Paul.
That proves Paul did not expect infallible treatment.

Does This Mean Calling a Priest “Father” Is Wrong?
Not necessarily.
If you understand:
- He is not God.
- He is not infallible.
- He can make mistakes.
- He must be tested by Scripture.
Then you are not violating Matthew 23.
The problem is not the word.
The problem is idolatry of authority.
Why This Matters Today
Many people misuse Matthew 23:9 to attack Christians.
But if taken literally:
- You cannot call your biological dad “father.”
- You cannot say “our father Abraham.”
- Paul would be in rebellion.
- Stephen would be disobedient.
- The apostles would contradict Christ.
That is impossible.
Scripture does not contradict itself.
Jesus was condemning spiritual pride and authoritarian hypocrisy — not vocabulary.
The Heart of the Teaching
Jesus is saying:
Only God is your ultimate source of truth.
Only Christ is your flawless Teacher.
Only the Trinity deserves total, unquestioning allegiance.
Every human leader is accountable.
That is the meaning.

Only God’s Word carries infallible authority.
Go Deeper
If you want deeper teachings on difficult Bible passages and how Scripture harmonizes without contradiction, explore our full apologetics library:
👉 https://evidence-for-the-bible.com/resource-library/
Strengthen your understanding.
Defend your faith.
Grow deeper in truth.
Related pages:
- Who Was Melchizedek? The Bible’s Most Mysterious Figure Explained
- What Did Jesus Mean by “I Can Do Nothing by Myself”?
- Why Would God’s Own City Jerusalem Be Called Sodom and Egypt?
- How Were People Saved Before Jesus? The Bible’s Clear Answer
- Exegetical Evidence For Jesus Claiming To Be GOD